He got ”a little annoyed” at having to wear 3D specs for 2 hours to watch Avatar, it hurt his nose. At home it’s better but still has issues, like cost.
”Maybe we’re getting to the point where the people who have been pushing 3D, or are pushing 3D now, have figured out a way to make it cool and not so nerdy that nobody wants to do it,” said id boss Hollenshead.
”My most recent, oh, okay, this is really cool experience with 3D was with the movie Avatar, which everybody has seen. Even then, I was a little annoyed that I had to wear these glasses for two hours in a movie. My nose hurt by the end of it.”
”I know the stuff in your living room is different. You can get higher quality glasses that fit. But you still gotta sit in your living room wearing these glasses. And then if you’re playing games and move your head then it can get out of phase, which is a major issue.”
”And, also, the TVs are f***ing expensive. Is there enough content to justify?” No, no there is not Mr Hollenshead. Frankly there are slim pickings to make getting a 3D TV worthwhile yet, and only the most tech orientated will bother for now.
Sony has begun by updating the PS3 with 3D support and then announcing a small selection of 3D ready titles, but still that hardly justifies bludgeoning your wallet. Have you already taken the 3D TV plunge or are you thinking about it, videogamer?
